
What would cause groups like NGA, the National Rifle Association, the American Civil Liberties Union, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and numerous religious and privacy organizations to unite against a cause? It is called the REAL ID Act, and, yet, many people have no idea what it is. My assertion is "if you know what it is and how it will affect you" then you WILL have an opinion and you WILL want something done about it.
REAL ID is a federal law passed in 2005 (and now being implemented) that imposes national standards for state-issued driver licenses in order to be accepted by the federal government for "official purposes." What official purposes, you might ask? In order to travel on an airplane, open a bank account, collect Social Security payments, or take advantage of nearly any government service you will need a federally approved ID card. . . in essence, a national ID card. The Department of Homeland Security is the governing power which has the power to set standards and determine whether state drivers' licenses pass muster. Only those IDs approved by the Department of Homeland Security can be accepted for official purposes by the feds. Many would argue that this new law doesn’t constitute a national id because the law only sets forth national standards and leaves the issuance of the cards and the maintenance of the database in state’s hands. However, these are uniform national standards with linked databases and these cards are MANDATORY if you wish to travel outside the US. We already have an ID that is mandatory for traveling outside of the US and it is called a PASSPORT.
The REAL ID (http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c109:3:./temp/~c109teRrdV:e47420:) was a piece of legislation that was hurried through the legislative process with little debate and no hearings. It garnered passage and executive approval because it was appended to a bill providing tsunami relief and military appropriations. Now that state-wide implementation is being required, several congressional leaders have come out against the Real ID regulations, arguing that the provisions pass the cost on to taxpayers, do not improve national security, and do not protect the privacy of Americans. From a statement issued by Senator Leahy (D-VT): “The Bush administration's Real ID program will not only lead to long lines at every DMV across the country, it will impose a massive unfunded mandate on state governments while offering absolutely no federal privacy protections to our citizens."
Identity theft is a real problem in this country. According to identitytheft.info, it is the fastest growing crime in the United States with over 15 million people victimized per year. That is approximately 7% of all adults having their identities stolen with about $3500 loss per victim. , “Close to 100 million additional adults have their personal identifying information placed at risk of identity theft each year when records maintained in government and corporate databases are lost or stolen. The sophistication level of professional identity thieves involved in organized crime continues to grow along with the methods they develop. From individually tailored phishing and vishing scams, to increasingly successful hacks of corporate and government databases, to elaborate networks of botnets designed to hijack millions of computers without any trace, there is an ever-increasing threat to all Americans.” REAL ID mandates that every state's database - containing Social Security cards, copies of birth certificates, etc. - be linked and accessible to tens of thousands of DMV employees. By making our personal information accessible to countless individuals across the country, Real ID exposes it to misuse and identity theft. And these databases will prove to be tantalizing. If you still aren’t concerned, google “dmv employees arrested.” There are more than 2.3 million results for that query . The DMV is the point of entry for your scanned birth certificate/passport/social security card. From there, your scanned documents go to the IT shop which stores the data; Database Administrators, Server Administrators, and even help desk staff. All it takes is the right question with the right amount of money to any person with access to the database. To see how secure this database was, I spoke to IT Department heads of various State Agencies. One of them said, “Your data is as secure as the person most likely to take a bribe at the institution you are interacting with.”
Real ID won't just cost you your privacy. Once the IDs and database are in place, their uses will inevitably expand to facilitate a wide range of surveillance activities. Remember, the Social Security number started innocently enough, but it is now required for a host of government services. Private companies now have access to social security information to create massive databases of personal information. A national ID poses similar dangers; for example, because "common machine-readable technology" will be required on every ID, the government and businesses will be able to easily read your private information off the cards in myriad contexts, allowing the government to track and monitor law-abiding citizen's every move in their daily lives like we are criminals on parole.
The sad thing is that the U.S. Constitution was written to prohibit the federal government from taking such drastic steps. The long-forgotten Tenth Amendment says that powers not explicitly delegated to the Feds "are reserved to the states" or to the people. Former Republican U.S. Representative Bob Barr said, "A person not possessing a Real ID Act-compliant identification card could not enter any federal building, or an office of his or her congressman or senator or the U.S. Capitol. This effectively denies that person their fundamental rights to assembly and to petition the government as guaranteed in the First Amendment."
To date, 24 states have enacted resolutions or binding legislation prohibiting participation in Real ID with another 8 states having pending legislation. The State of Utah passed a resolution that states that REAL ID is,“ in opposition to the Jeffersonian principles of individual liberty, free markets, and limited government." It further states that "the use of identification-based security cannot be justified as part of a 'layered' security system if the costs of the identification 'layer'--in dollars, lost privacy, and lost liberty--are greater than the security identification provides" and "the "common machine-readable technology" required by the REAL ID Act would convert state-issued driver licenses and identification cards into tracking devices, allowing computers to note and record people's whereabouts each time they are identified.” The resolution also holds, “ the requirement that states maintain databases of information about their citizens and residents and then share this personal information with all other states will expose every state to the information security weaknesses of every other state and threaten the privacy of every American" and "the REAL ID Act wrongly coerces states into doing the federal government's bidding by threatening to refuse non-complying states' citizens the privileges and immunities enjoyed by other states' citizens." To reiterate, 24 STATES are protesting REAL ID. http://www.realnightmare.org/news/105/
Real ID suffers from serious flaws that will affect the rights of every American. Any way you look at it, this national ID scheme is a bad law that needs to be scrapped. It is enormously expensive, offers little to no benefits, and places our personal information at risk for use in identify theft. It's not too late to fight back—state legislators can still resist implementing the Real ID Act and force Congress' hand. Call your state legislators NOW.
Having attended many Homeland Security events in DC over the past few months, I feel I can understand why the REAL ID would be so beneficial. DHS continuously faces issues on communication among their 22 sub-organizations, like Immigrations and Customs, FBI, Secret Service,TSA, etc. Their lack of communication and data sharing makes it incredibly difficult to prevent acts of terrorism, such as the 12/25 bomber. Additionally, the lack of uniform identification makes it that much easier for illegal immigrants to forge documentation. Currently, DHS and ICE are in the process of placing biometric scanners at all the land ports of entry, which is quickly reducing traffic at the border. If the REAL ID is implemented, I could see the time being reduced even more dramatically. The key to REAL ID is cyber security. Currently, the US government has not proven to its citizens that our personal information is safe. Should the REAL ID be implemented, the database would be under constant attack. The legislators on Capital Hill are continuously sending out new cyber security laws; however, the government itself is not compliant with the laws. The government should set a gold standard for cyber security prior to implementing any such database, gaining the trust and respect of Americans. Finally, the local DMV should not be the issuing office. DHS should develop a new process for obtaining the REAL ID and open local offices across the country to ensure proper procedures. DHS has faced significant budget deficits and lacks the support of the administration - it will be interesting to see where REAL ID goes and the State's reactions.
ReplyDeleteI've written about this issue at length from the perspective of a retired law enforcement officer. Here's my blog posting:
ReplyDeletehttp://retiredpublicsafety.com/wp/the-10th-amendment-loses-again-the-real-id-act-what-it-means-to-you/
The benefits are greatly outweighed by the risks to all of us. If the federal government (FG) wants to implement a voluntary ID card, let them do so. They certainly appear to have the resources. It is unconstitutional for the FG to impose requirements on states for a function that is a state responsibility per the 10th Amendment.
Also of note is the fact that HR 418 (the original 2005 REAL ID bill) did not get enacted- this legislation had to be snuck in the back door with military/natural disaster legislation (Emergency Supplemental
Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Tsunami Relief, 2005), HR 1286.
Since 9-11-2010, the American people have been sold a bill of goods in the name of protecting the citizens of the US. The price for this "protection" is loss of privacy and liberty. Benjamin Franklin said it best, “Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither.”
ReplyDeleteHow much liberty and privacy are you willing to give up? And just where will the federal government draw the line on what information it will require from its citizens? Even if it were as simple as asking where should the federal government stop, we should be asking ourselves is it LEGAL for the federal government to do this? Just because they mandate it, doesn't mean it is constitutional. They have no authority to be involved in the issuance of state driver's licenses. That is a state function and one protected by the 10th Amendment. One of the concerns mentioned was air travel. If they are attempting to secure air travel, then they can enact legislation for those who wish to utilize air travel.
Oops! I meant 2001!
ReplyDelete